"Exploring Adolf Hitler's Failed Career as a Painter: Details and Legacy"

Adolf Hitler, the dictator of Nazi Germany, did indeed have aspirations of becoming an artist in his early life. However, his career as a painter was largely unsuccessful and did not provide him with a stable income. Here are some details about Hitler's life as a painter:

Beforehand Interest in Art Hitler showed an early interest in art during his youth in Austria. He applied to the Vienna Academy of Fine Trades doubly but was rejected both times.

Struggles as an Artist: 

Despite his rejection from art school, Hitler continued to paint and draw. His works mainly consisted of landscapes, cityscapes, and architectural pieces. However, his artistic abilities were mediocre at best, and he struggled to gain recognition or sell his paintings.

Vienna Period: 

During his time in Vienna, Hitler lived in poverty, often selling his paintings to make ends meet. He frequented art galleries and museums but faced constant rejection and criticism from the artistic community.

Military Service: 

Hitler's artistic ambitions were put on hold when he volunteered to serve in the German army during World War I. After the war, he became involved in politics

"Ethics and Power: Navigating the Complexities of Political Behavior" (political cartoons)

It's a common perception that some politicians might engage in unethical or morally questionable behavior to maintain or gain power. This can include actions such as corruption, manipulation of electoral processes, exploitation of societal divisions, or disregarding democratic norms.

However, it's important to recognize that not all politicians engage in such behavior, and sweeping generalizations can be unfair. Many politicians enter public service with genuine intentions to make positive changes in society and uphold the principles of democracy.

Furthermore, the extent to which politicians can get away with unethical behavior often depends on the robustness of a country's institutions, the vigilance of its citizens, and the strength of its legal and regulatory frameworks. Strong democratic institutions, a free press, an independent judiciary, and an engaged civil society are crucial in holding politicians accountable and preventing abuses of power.

While instances of politicians behaving unethically or abusing power certainly occur, it's essential to maintain a

"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth" - Plato

The quote "No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth" is often attributed to the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. However, it's important to note that the exact origin of this phrase is uncertain, and it has been echoed in various forms throughout history by different thinkers and writers.

The sentiment expressed in this quote reflects the idea that individuals who speak out honestly or challenge prevailing beliefs or systems may face backlash or opposition from those who are comfortable with the status quo or who feel threatened by the truth being revealed.

Throughout history, many figures who have spoken uncomfortable truths or challenged established norms have indeed faced criticism, persecution, or even hatred from those who opposed their message. However, their courage in speaking out often serves to inspire others and contributes to positive change over time.

#Plato #Ancient #Greek #philosophy#Socratic #Method#Metaphysics #Ontology #Theory of Forms#Epistemology#Dialectic#Ethics#Politics

#Republic#Virtue#Tripartite#Reason#Spirit#Appetite#Ideal #society #Justice#Aesthetics#Literature#Allegory#Philosophy#art#Dialogues

#Influence #Western 

"Navigating the Gray Area: Understanding Politicians' Statements about the Future" (2048 Ranil's dream kingdom)

It's a common perception that politicians sometimes make promises or projections about the future that may not always come to fruition, leading to accusations of lying or misleading the public. This phenomenon can stem from various factors:

Uncertainty: 

The future is inherently uncertain, and politicians may overestimate their ability to predict or control outcomes. They might promise certain outcomes without fully considering the complexities and unpredictability of future events.

Political Expediency: 

Politicians may make statements about the future that align with their short-term political goals or agendas, even if they are aware that those statements may not be entirely accurate or realistic.

Incomplete Information: 

Sometimes politicians may make promises or projections based on incomplete or inaccurate information, leading to statements that may not be fully reliable.

Changing Circumstances: 

The political landscape and external circumstances can change rapidly, making it difficult for politicians to fulfill all their promises or predictions.

Rhetoric vs. Reality: 

Politicians may engage in rhetorical strategies that emphasize positive outcomes or downplay negative ones, even if those outcomes are uncertain or unlikely.

However, it's important to note that not all statements about the future made by politicians are necessarily lies. Some may genuinely believe in the

Politicians oppress people as a means of survival

Politicians putting pressure on people can manifest in various ways, some of which may include:

Policy Pressure: 

Politicians may use their power to implement policies that put pressure on certain groups or individuals. This could be through taxation policies, regulatory measures, or changes in legislation that affect specific demographics.

Rhetorical Pressure: 

Politicians may employ rhetoric that pressures people to conform to certain beliefs or behaviors. This could involve using fear tactics, exaggerations, or misleading information to manipulate public opinion and coerce compliance.

Social Pressure: 

Politicians often wield significant social influence, and they may use their platforms to pressure individuals or groups into supporting their agenda. This can involve rallying supporters, demonizing opponents, or ostracizing dissenters.

Economic Pressure: 

Politicians may leverage economic power to exert pressure on individuals or businesses. This could involve offering incentives for compliance, threatening punitive measures for non-compliance, or manipulating economic conditions to achieve desired outcomes.

Legal Pressure: 

Politicians may utilize the legal system to exert pressure on individuals or organizations. This could involve initiating investigations, filing lawsuits, or passing laws that target specific groups or behaviors.

Media Pressure: 

Politicians often have relationships with media outlets and may use them to apply pressure on people indirectly. This could involve controlling the narrative, shaping public discourse, or influencing public opinion through selective dissemination of information.

Overall, the ways in which politicians put pressure on people can vary widely depending on their goals, the political context, and the tools at their disposal. While some forms of pressure may be legitimate and necessary for governance, others can be manipulative or oppressive, undermining democratic principles and individual freedoms.

To what extent can politics put pressure on the media?

Politics can exert significant pressure on the media, impacting its ability to operate independently and fulfill its role as a watchdog and provider of unbiased information. This pressure can manifest in several ways:

Ownership and Control: 

Politically affiliated individuals or entities may own or control media organizations, influencing the editorial direction and content produced. This can lead to biased reporting or suppression of information that is unfavorable to those in power.

Advertising Revenue: 

Media outlets often rely on advertising revenue to sustain their operations. Politicians or political parties may use their control over advertising budgets to reward favorable coverage or punish critical reporting. Additionally, businesses may withhold advertising dollars from media outlets that publish unfavorable stories about them or their allies.

Access to Information: 

Politicians have control over access to information, including press conferences, official statements, and government data. They may restrict access to journalists who are critical of their administration or provide preferential treatment to those who toe the party line.

Legal and Regulatory Pressure: 

Governments can pass laws and regulations that directly or indirectly constrain media freedom. This could include defamation laws used to silence criticism, licensing requirements that restrict the number of media outlets, or regulations that limit foreign ownership of media companies.

Intimidation and Harassment: 

Politicians or their supporters may intimidate journalists through threats, harassment, or legal action. This can create a chilling effect, discouraging reporters from investigating sensitive topics or holding those in power accountable.

Propaganda and Disinformation: 

Politicians may disseminate propaganda or disinformation through state-controlled media or by manipulating social media platforms. This can confuse the public and undermine trust in independent journalism.

Cooptation: 

In some cases, politicians may coopt journalists by offering them access, favors, or exclusive information in exchange for favorable coverage. This can compromise journalistic integrity and undermine the media's role as a watchdog.

Overall, the extent to which politics can put pressure on the media depends on factors such as the level of press freedom, the strength of democratic institutions, and the willingness of journalists to resist undue influence. Maintaining a free and independent media is essential for democracy, as it ensures that citizens have access to accurate information and can hold their leaders accountable.

The Artistic Alchemy: Transforming Society One Brushstroke at a Time

In a world brimming with challenges and complexities, art emerges as a potent force capable of stirring hearts, challenging minds, and igniting change. While some may perceive art as a mere aesthetic indulgence, its transformative power extends far beyond galleries and stages. In this exploration, we delve into the profound ways in which art catalyzes societal transformation, unveiling its capacity to inspire, provoke, and ultimately, reshape the world we inhabit.

. Raising Consciousness Through Visual Narratives:

Art serves as a visceral medium for raising consciousness on pressing issues that often evade public discourse. From thought-provoking paintings depicting environmental degradation to poignant photography capturing the plight of marginalized communities, visual narratives wield the power to transcend linguistic barriers and evoke profound empathy. Case studies such as Banksy's iconic murals and Yann Arthus-Bertrand's "Earth from Above" exhibition illustrate how art can thrust urgent concerns into the spotlight, compelling individuals to confront uncomfortable truths.

. Harmonizing Hearts and Minds:

Beyond its capacity to incite action, art fosters an ethos of empathy and interconnectedness essential for fostering societal cohesion. Through the universal language of emotion, music, literature, and performance art bridge divides, cultivating a shared sense of humanity amidst cultural diversity. Consider the unifying power of events like the "Concert for Bangladesh" and Maya Angelou's timeless verses, which transcend borders and ideologies to unite audiences in collective reflection and solidarity.

. Subverting Norms:

At its most revolutionary, art subverts entrenched norms and challenges the status quo, serving as a potent catalyst for social change. Whether through provocative theater productions challenging gender stereotypes or avant-garde movements dismantling institutionalized racism, artistic expression disrupts complacency, sparking vital conversations that propel society toward progress. Notable examples include the feminist punk activism of Pussy Riot and the boundary-pushing works of contemporary artists like Ai Weiwei, whose defiance inspires defiance against oppression worldwide.

. Cultivating Creativity for Change:

Artistic endeavors not only reflect societal currents but also cultivate the creativity necessary for innovation and adaptation in an ever-evolving world. By nurturing imagination, lateral thinking, and experimentation, art empowers individuals to reimagine possibilities and envision alternative futures. Initiatives such as community-based arts education programs and interdisciplinary collaborations exemplify how harnessing creative potential at grassroots levels can foster resilience and drive sustainable development.

Conclusion:

In the tapestry of human existence, art emerges as both a mirror and catalyst, illuminating our collective aspirations and propelling us towards a more just and equitable future. As stewards of this transformative force, let us embrace the role of artists, patrons, and enthusiasts alike in harnessing creativity for the betterment of society. For in the vibrant palette of artistic expression lies the promise of a world transformed—one brushstroke, one melody, one story at a time.

References:

Banksy. "Exit Through the Gift Shop." Paranoid Pictures, 2010.

Arthus-Bertrand, Yann. "Earth from Above." Abrams, 2005.

Angelou, Maya. "And Still I Rise." Random House, 1978.

Pussy Riot. "Punk Prayer." Performance, 2012.

Ai Weiwei. "Sunflower Seeds." Tate Modern, 2010.

Squint your eyes - see more '--- ඇස් පුංචිකරලා බලන්න - see more

 The destruction of a country and the fall of a politician often serve as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between leadership and the well-being of a nation. When a country faces devastation, it is not merely its physical infrastructure that crumbles but also the hopes and dreams of its people. Politicians, entrusted with the responsibility of safeguarding and fostering a nation, play a pivotal role in its fate. Their decisions can either lead to prosperity or contribute to a nation's decline. However, it is crucial to remember that the destruction of a country and a politician's downfall are interrelated. A failed leadership can disintegrate a nation, while a nation in turmoil can bring about the end of a politician's career. This intertwined relationship underscores the significance of effective, responsible governance and the profound impact it has on a country's destiny. 

India's Statement on Israel-Hamas conflict (narendra modi )

India reiterates call for ‘sovereign, independent, viable state of Palestine’

India’s “longstanding and consistent” policy on the Palestinian state remains unchanged, says MEA spokesperson; 

“Our policy in this regard has been long-standing and consistent. India has always advocated the resumption of direct negotiations towards establishing a sovereign, independent, and viable State of Palestine living within secure and recognized borders, side by side at peace with Israel," 

 

(Was washed and dried) #deepthi kumara gunarathne

  අපුල්ලා වැලක වනා ඇත...........  (Was washed and dried) #deepthi kumara gunarathne

Karma and Rewards

 

ජාත්‍යන්තර කුමන්ත්‍රණ

 

Pet Media

 

save green

 

ඇමති සහ 650000 පුටුව

- goo.gl/szA35j

සමාජවාදය වෙත දුෂ්කර ගමනක්.....

ඊලග පිම්මට සූදානම්......ready to next jump —

අගමැතිට මොකද වුනේ.....?

rajitha senaratne and his politics

පැරණි වමේ අද තත්වය (NEW SITUATON OF OLD LEFT)

keheliya rambukwella (මාධ්‍ය නිදහස හරහ ගමනක්)